Friday, 20 November 2009

CIPD Conference 2009

 

DSCN1862   These are my CIPD conference posts:

 

 

 

I hope you enjoy the posts, and the conference (whether you attended in person or through the tweets / posts).

I’m still going to put up a summary of the conference, but I’ve got no doubt about my main take-away: social media’s here and it’s not going away.

OK, social media may not have had quite the profile I’d have liked in Next Generation HR but it was very clearly present in Emmanuel Gobillot’s, Nick Shackleton-Jones’ and Shaa Wasmund’s sessions.  And of course throughout the conference thanks to ‘the gang’.

 

As an aside, I was touched to have my own use of social media referred to by several of the speakers too:

  • References to my tweets and this blog as well as the only partly accurate accusation that I don’t have life! (thank you Emmanuel!)
  • A reference to my live blogging of the final keynote (thanks Shaa)
  • Thanks for taking the conference to the masses (I’m sure Vicky Wright really meant to thank me and the gang for this!).

 

I think the implication of all this is that HR’s got to get much more familiar with social media.  Have a look at the quiz Nick Shackleton-Jones used (pictured, and also available here).  Then think about what technologies you should be more acquainted with if you’re going to influence your current and future workforce in the new era of total transparency.

 

 

Scoring the quiz:

 

(I got 21 which has shot up from about 6 soon after Penelope Trunk did her post – so it doesn’t take that long to get it sorted.)

 

 

 

 

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

.

Thursday, 19 November 2009

CIPD09: A New Leadership Paradigm (Part 2)

 

   Live blog from the CIPD 2009 conference final panel keynote:

 

 

 

And it’s a wrap!

 

 

Also see part 1 of this post: http://strategic-hcm.blogspot.com/2009/11/cipd09-new-leadership-paradigm.html

 

 

 

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

    .

  • CIPD09: Sharon Doherty on Beyond Business Partnering

     

    DSCN1874  Last time I saw Sharon Doherty from Laing O’Rouke present, I didn’t manage to post on her presentation.  So in this session, I’m correcting the omission.

    Sharon has done the same as Kevin White and conducted a mini survey for us talking for a few other HR Directors.  My summary of the key points includes:

    • Individual becomes individual, team and organisational effectiveness – Lynda Gratton, LBS
    • Need for adaptability - Philip Stiles, Cambridge
    • Standard becomes bespoke (eg meeting needs of diverse global workforce with four generations of employees in the workforce) – Stephen Dando, Thomson Reuters
    • Investing in HR’s own capability - Stephen Dando, Thomson Reuters
    • Developing financial capability and business understanding - Anne Minto, Centrica
    • Need to deliver a unique contribution without flamboyant language - Claire Thomas, GSK
    • Understand interdependency and think about end-to-end process and working together - Hugh Mitchell, Shell
    • Standardise the relationships – have all you HR BPs doing the same thing - Ronald Schellekens, Vodafone.

     

    Sharon’s summary of this is that HR departments aren’t adding strategic value (and that this is good news for consultants).

    Her suggestion is that companies need to work in 5 zones:

    1. Core HR – individual people work
    2. Human capital including team work (I think this is social capital?)
    3. Organisational effectiveness – company-wide work
    4. External work
    5. Executive work.

     

    Sharon also talked about the really interesting work she’s been doing in different companies including Lang O’Rourke.  Most interesting for me, given my posts on leadership and communityship today, is the team aspect of HR work (in her Zone 2) at BAA Terminal 5 where the company took responsibility for employee engagement of other companies (60% of these said they liked working for T5)!

     

    Sharon asked ‘Why can’t other companies do all this?’.

    The answer is that of course they can.  I liked Sharon’s presentation but I don’t agree with her view of consultants – we’re not in competition.  For some things, it will make sense to use consultants, for others it won’t.  Wise HR teams will understand which.

    So some organisations will use consultants to help them operate in all 5 zones.  I don’t see any problems in this.  And of course, when organisations choose to work with me, I do what I can to help them build their skills through this process.

    Or if companies want to do everything themselves, they can use consultants to help them build these skills (the Human Capital Strategist certificate course and other workshops I deliver do this).

     

     

     

     

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

    .

  • CIPD09: Leading the HR function

     

       I was hoping to see Warner Burke this morning, but he seems to have disappeared off the programme, so instead I’m with Kevin White from the Home Office and Stephen Lehane from Alliance Boots talking about HR leadership.

    White has conducted his own mini-survey of 70 current and future leaders in civil service HR.

    Some of the quotes from the survey relating to how HR leadership is perceived today include:

    • You have to have the balls
    • A sense of humour is essential
    • Business first, HR second
    • Psycho-babble misinterpreted as knowledge
    • Saying ‘no’ whilst offering options
    • A high IQ is helpful
    • Trying to please too much
    • Inspirational and passionate
    • Ignorance translated into chaos
    • All mouth and no trousers.

     

    You’ll know from my previous posts that I have concerns over this “business first, HR second” thing.  But I thought White expressed it nicely: We earn the right to set at the table through our expertise, but we need to get better at understanding the wider organisation to understand how to apply HR solutions.

    Other thoughts:

    • Senior leaders of HR may be better coming from outside of the function, but you need some structure around this
    • HR makes great number 2s to their CEOs (people who are determined to be #1 may not be flexible enough (it’s not about you).

     

       Lehane suggests the following attributes:

    • Positive dissatisfaction
    • Leading for what you care about
    • Big relationships
    • Understanding the ‘real system’
    • Building demand
    • Active engagement
    • Avoid HR
    • Deliver the basics
    • Enrol your Personal Support team.

     

    Relationships are of course the area I’m suggesting all leaders need to focus on.  Lehane is asking about how do you make your relationships bigger and deeper?  “Think about your worst relationship and work on it.  You’ve got to invest in it to develop your ability to get things done.”

    His point on building demand links to this as well.  HR needs to support things bur it needs to stand for things and lead things as well.  It needs to be bold and confident.  It shouldn’t be about selling products.  “If you need to work on getting buy-in, you’re not sufficiently embedded in your organisation, you don’t really understand what’s going on.”

     

     

     

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

    .

  • CIPD09: A New Leadership Paradigm

     

       I enjoyed day 2 of the CIPD Conference more than day 1 (I met some people who thought the reverse, so of course it’s a personal thing, partly depending upon which sessions you attend, and a whole heap of other things as well).  I particularly enjoyed Nick Baylis on ‘the Rough Guide to Happiness’ and Sarah Redshaw from Unilever on ‘Building Transformation through Engagement’.  I’ve not blogged on these sessions, but you can see plenty of tweets from me and others on Twitter, using the hashtag #CIPD09 (if you don’t know what this means, you really should you know).

    The highlight from today should be the end of day keynote, ‘a New Leadership Paradigm’.  The outline certainly looks interesting (and just seeing John Humphrys live should be good):

     

    Public respect for leaders has hit an all time low. The exposed inadequacy of those in leadership positions has brought current thinking on leadership and the established models into question.

    Today, it seems that there is a substantial lack of ‘real’ and successful leaders equipped with both the resilience and capability to deal with the complexity and pressures of the ever changing global market. So are we now at a cross roads? Is this an ideal opportunity to challenge the current view of what it takes to be a good leader and to establish what behaviours and competences will be needed to lead organisations and societies into our uncertain future?


    Join us to debate:

    • Why and how have traditional models failed?
    • How can we learn from the past and build on its successes?
    • How can we re-establish leadership credibility?
    • What skills and attributes will successful leaders of the future need?

     

     

    I’ll be live blogging from the session, but here are a few thoughts to warm-things up.

    Firstly, I think it is a really big and important question.  I do think existing leadership is failing.  Look at Hay’s stats from yesterday, or simply the end results (the recession we’re now in).  And we know that leadership accounts for a significant part of this (Jim Collins’ point that leaders can destroy organisations on their own).

    I agree that resilience and capability are part of what needs to be fixed.  But I think attitudes need changing too.  We need to look again at what we mean by leadership and change the way that leaders lead.

    And we’ve had a few pointers during the conference, particularly from Jim Collins on Level 5 leadership, and the need for leaders to act through others to create greatness; and Emmanuel Gobillot on the connected leader in his session on Leadershift.

    Leaders may have a particular role but they achieve success through their community.

    It seems to be a view that’s taking off.

    I was talking about this with Jonathan Austin at the Best Companies exhibition stand yesterday too.  He had just attended a session with Edgar Schein where Schein had been talking about leaders as ‘humble engineers’ who need to work through others to make their organisations work.  And I’ve already posted on Social Advantage on Henry Mintzberg’s concept of Communityship.

    Emphasising that companies are not collectives of human resources, but communities of human beings, Mintzberg suggests that traditional views of leadership isolate people in leadership positions, thereby undermining a sense of community in organisations.  He believes leadership and communityship go hand-in-hand: "A community leader is personally engaged in order to engage others, so that anyone and everyone can exercise initiative".

    And it’s by developing this sense of community that individuals become bound to each other and start to want to focus on developing the productivity of their organisation as a whole, rather than acting purely out of self-interest.

     

    That’d be the basis of my answer if I was on the stage today.  And it’s also one of the things I write about at my other blog, Social Advantage, and you might want to check over there.

    Join me for the live blog if you can!

     

     

     

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

    .

  • Using social media at CIPD09

     

    My favourite session yesterday was Nick Shackleton-Jones (@shackletonjones) on the use of social media supporting online learning at the BBC.  I was going to blog on this, but Rob Moss from Personnel Today got their first, so see his summary on this.

    Instead, I thought I’d write about the use of social media at the CIPD conference itself.

    There have been quite a few of us blogging and tweeting, and in many ways, this has led to the development of a small community, sharing experiences and learning with everyone else through social media, but also face-to-face between ourselves.   At times, it’s felt like a conference within a conference.

    So, thanks for a great conference everybody!

    Martin Couzins (@martincouzins) and Rob Moss (@robmoss) plus Kat Baker and Louisa Peacock from Personnel Today / XpertHR (@PersonnelToday  / @XpertHR / @HRSpace), all busy in the Press Office:

    DSCN1858 

    DSCN1860

    Charlie Duff (@charlie_elise) from HR Zone (@HRZone) :

    DSCN1842

    Adrienne Fox (@foxlondon)writing for HR Magazine (US):

    DSCN1876

    Jennifer Liston-Smith (@listonsmith) writing for the BPS:

    DSCN1856 

    Mike Morrison from RapidBI (@rapidbi) on the right, also with Nick Spindler from Nationwide:

    (Check our Mike’s notes from the conference at cipd2008.blogspot.com)

    DSCN1835

    Steve Bridger (@stevebridger) from CIPD Communities (@CIPDcommunities):

    DSCN1855

     

    Last night, we met up at the CIPD’s tweet-up.

    Julia (Twitter username pending!):

    DSCN1866

    Mike (@rapidbi) with Klothilde (@kganzer):

    DSCN1868

    Steve and David (sharing @RightwayCWS) with Irsa (username pending)

    DSCN1869 

    The CIPD’s Natalia (@NAlexandrou or @CIPD_Events) with Charlie (@charlie_elise or @HRZone) and Steve (@stevebridger or @CIPDcommunities):

    DSCN1863

     

    Well done to the CIPD for raising the role of social media this year.  There’s still a way to go, but it’s been a very good start.

     

    A few other non-Twitter peeps (I won’t say ‘muggles’ again!).

    Perry Timms from the BIG Lottery Fund before his session ‘Communicating with Impact’:

    DSCN1831

    Former colleague, Alison Crossley:

    DSCN1851

    The Elsevier stand – my book’s just about visible on the back shelf:

    DSCN1832

     

     

     

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

    .

  • Wednesday, 18 November 2009

    CIPD09: Beyond engagement

     

    DSCN1848   This session is on going beyond employee engagement.

    Robert Browton from Hay has been presenting some of their research.  We all know that people have been working harder to beat the recession and Hay’s surveys suggest that 36% of people have increased the length of their working week.

    The good news is that 84% of people say their teams are willing to support each other and 85% say that they are committed to helping their organisation survive.

    But there’s more bad news than good.  68% say of people say there is no reward for the additional effort they are putting in, 63% feel their organisation doesn’t appreciate the effort they’re putting in and 57% believe their staff have been treated as a low-value commodity.

    Because of this, 59% of people are considering leaving, actively looking or have accepted a job offer.  And of those not thinking of leaving right now, 87% say its due to a lack of vacancies, 92% think it’s just too risky to start a new job.

    So a lot of people have already gone in spirit, and as soon as they can, they may be gone in body too.

    One main reason why people are disengaged are the barriers their organisations set up that stop them performing effectively (unfortunately we didn’t get much more than this).

     

    We then moved on to Clare Marriott from Rentokil Pest Control (filling in for Mary Edmunds from Barclays) which seeks to engage its staff (colleagues) around its mission, vision and spirit (service, relationships and teamwork) – developed through focus groups earlier this year in response to the company’s problems last year.

    Your Voice Counts is Rentokil’s colleague survey and links to their customer survey, Our Customers’’ Voice Counts which uses the Net Promoter Score.

    Linked to Hay’s point about organisational barriers, the colleague survey also asks questions like I have the tools I need to do my job, do  have the authority I need to do my job etc.

     

     

    So, interesting stats, good case study of successful engagement through use of an engagement survey, but beyond engagement?  Mmm.  I’m trying to keep positive today so I’ll not comment.  You decide (and do let me know)!

     

     

    You can see more of my recent posts on engagement here: ‘Are engagement surveys a waste of time'?’

    And for those of you going to the session on, or interested in the Government’s Engagement Review (David MacLeod and Nita Clarke), there’s this post and some comments from one of their previous presentations on my Moon Shots community forum too.

     

     

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

    .

  • CIPD09: Next Generation HR?

     

       A quick summary

    This session provided a preview of the CIPD’s new flagship research project, Next Generation HR, which aims to prompt HR to start thinking about and debating what the profession needs to look like in the future.

    The speakers were Lee Seas from CIPD’s recently acquired consultancy Bridge, Andrea Cartwright from Nationwide, Therese Procter from Tesco and Alex Wilson from BT (pictured).

    We know that, despite Jim Collins’ exhortations, businesses are becoming ever more focused on the short-term.  And HR has had to act ‘lean and mean’ to keep its credibility during the recession.  However, there is also the sense of a seismic change or inflexion point in the opportunity for HR to contribute to the development of trust and loyalty etc.

    In response to these changes, the research suggests:

    • HR needs to shift from being internally focused to having business and sustainable organisational performance at its core
    • To do this it needs to build a culture which balances short-term risk management and longer-term organisational health and agility with authenticity.
    • This means the type of HR leadership we need also has to change, and will need to be based less on process than it typically is now.

     

    The full research will be published in January, and you’ll be able to read my reactions here.

    In the meantime:

     

    Going negative?

    I was told last night that my contributions to Personnel Today’s live chat on the presentation were a bit negative.

    Well, I didn’t mean them to be, and I’m sorry if I’ve upset anyone, or if this means that I’m not invited back to future conferences as CIPD’s press blogger, or even better as a speaker.

    I am pleased that the CIPD is trying to show the profession the way forward.  I also agree with many of the research’s conclusions, such as the need for insight driven HR.  I’m pleased to be at the conference, and in general, I had a good day.

    But I didn’t think the presentation was that wonderful.  A presentation and a report are two different things, and when presenting, it’s not always useful to follow the structure of the report.  It would also have been useful to have allowed time for questions and to have finished on time.

    More importantly, I don’t think Sears’ presentation, or the case studies (which were fine in their own right) described the required “seismic shift” in the profession.  Calling something “next generation” suggests a very different set of attributes and I didn’t get the sense of that much change.  I’d have liked to have seen more ambition in what’s supposed to be some “flagship” research.

    Anyway, the CIPD has said it wants to start a debate on the research and I want to play my part in this.  Debate isn’t the same as uncritical reporting.

    Incidentally, if I had wanted to be negative, there’s a number of other things I could have commented on, such as my professional institution paying £3m for a consultancy which is going to directly compete with some of its members (eg me).  Don’t get me started on this!

     

    Some opportunities for real innovation

    Human Capital Management

    Given the name of this blog, and my ongoing posting, you won’t be surprised that I think HCM provides one substantially different way forward.  Alex Wilson emphasised the need for HR to be ‘business people’ first but I don’t agree with this vision of our future.

    There’s a ‘third way’ which isn’t about focusing on HR process, and doesn’t lead us to becoming a generic business function (although one which is likely to live in Finance’s shadow), which is to focus on human capital.

    I believe our main need is to understand the opportunities to create new capabilities in our organisations, and to show our colleagues in the rest of the business how these capabilities can provide the basis for transformed performance and competitive advantage.

    To gain these benefits, organisations need to put people first.  And this means HR people need to be ‘people people’, or better, ‘human capital people’, as I don’t mean to suggest a return to being ‘touchy feely’ or focusing on ‘tea and sympathy’.  I just think our biggest opportunity to contribute comes from developing a deep insight about the way that we can influence our employees’ attitudes and behaviours.

    Yes, of course, we need to understand the business.  Absolutely.  But our biggest contribution comes from being different to other functions rather than the same.

     

    More information: Strategic HCM blog, jon [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

     

     

    The Social Business

    I was talking to some of the CIPD and other folk last night about what I think is the biggest shift impacting our businesses.  This is what some people are calling the social business.  And at the moment, most of these people are working in IT.

    Five or so years ago, some of our IT colleagues started talking about Enterprise 2.0, or the application of web 2.0 tools within our organisations (see my post on the CIPD’s report on this).  But it’s also broader than this, it’s about the cultural and behavioural changes that using web 2.0 requires and enables.  These IT people are now getting to the point that they’re starting to realise that actually, the key challenges in enterprise 2.0 aren’t about the technology.  They’re about changing the culture, shifting peoples’ attitudes and generating new behaviours.

    So, over the last couple of month’s there have been a couple of conferences on Enterprise 2.0, in US and Europe.  And because IT people tend to blog and tweet more extensively than HR people do, it’s been quite easy to follow these conferences from afar.  And the sense I’ve got of these conferences is of a couple of hundred IT people talking together about culture change!  And there’s been little to no HR contribution to this.  I’ve submitted a proposal to present at the next E2.0 conference in Boston, but as it’ll be mainly IT people voting on this, I’m not that hopeful of being chosen.

    So wouldn’t it be wonderful to talk about this at the CIPD’s conference!

    To an extent, this is what Emmanuel Gobillot did, but I’d have liked to have seen more about the practical application of his insights to organisations (this is what I post on at my other blog: Social Advantage).  And I’d have liked to have seen it at the centre of the CIPD’s Next Generation HR presentation too (instead, as one of the people on PT’s  live chat pointed out, there was no mention of social media / social aspects of organisations at all).

    And how does HR contribute (or lead! – why not?) the social business?  Again, it’s not by being a better business person.  It’s by becoming an organisational sociologist or anthropologist.  And becoming fluent in social media tools too!

     

    More information: this recent article at HR Zone, Social Advantage blog, jon [dot] ingham [at] social [dash] advantage [dot] com

     

     

    What else?

    Are these ideas innovative?  Different?  Seismically so?

    I believe so, and I think there are lots more opportunities like these (human capital and the social business are just the areas of what I see as new generation HR that I’ve chosen to blog on, not the only areas there are, or that I consult upon).

    What about using the insights of neuroscience to change HR’s and our employees’ activities?  Developing a tie-in with ethics and CSR (to be fair, the CIPD’s presentation did include quite a lot of discussion on sustainability and integrity)?  The use of social media tools within HR (HR 2.0)?

    There are lots of opportunities, and I think next generation HR departments are going to be those that select from this longer list to decide how they’ve going to operate within their own organisations in order to produce the maximum impact that they can.  For some of these, it might be something based upon business sustainability as in the CIPD research.  And others, it might be some of the ideas I’ve written about above, or something else!

    What’s Next Generation HR going to involve for you?

     

     

    More

    Find further conference reports at

    http://strategic-hcm.blogspot.com/cipd09

    http://twitter.com/joningham

     

    And come back on Friday 20 November for a summary of the whole conference.

     

     

     

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

    .

  • Tuesday, 17 November 2009

    CIPD09: Emmanuel Gobilott on Leadership

     

    DSCN1830   Emmanuel Gobillot started his presentation with ‘Shift Happens’ – the second conference speaker I’ve seen in two weeks to do this.  Personally, I wouldn’t use it (too many people like me who’ve seen it too many times), but the video did set the context for Emmanuel’s speech quite nicely.  And I’d guess most people in this audience won’t have seen it anyway.

    Also, Emmanuel has mentioned me three times in his speech, so I’m not going to be too critical am I?  Actually, I wouldn’t be critical anyway – I think Leadershift provides a very apt description of the changes I’m seeing in the world.

    The presentation wasn’t a practical one, but focused on a necessary mindset change.  And a shift in the way that we lead.

    The shift is based on these four challenges:

    • Demographic – what happens when you’re working with people who have nothing in common with you?
    • Expertise – business models are adapting (eg through mass customisation, crowdsourcing, mass participation, mass collaboration)
    • Attention – where do we focus? – a need to create your own information space (including my blog apparently)
    • Democratic – we’re changing the way we feel about our companies as fast as we change our clothes.

     

    The impact of these changes is that your experience, expertise, efforts and power are now DEAD.

    But you still need to gain the engagement, accountability and commitment of your staff?  How?  Well, unfortunately I’ve run out of time (lunch is calling) – I’ll come back and finish this post later.

     

    Do call back – or visit my Social Advantage blog for some reasonably aligned thoughts on leadershift.

     

     

    UPDATE WEDNESDAY MORNING: TOO MUCH RED WINE LAST NIGHT!  I’LL HAVE TO FINISH THIS OFF LATER.  MAYBE TONIGHT, MAYBE AT THE WEEKEND.  DEFINITELY BY MONDAY!

     

     

     

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

    .

  • Welcome to CIPD09: Jim Collins on the Quest for Greatness

     

    Jim Collins This year’s CIPD conference is kicking off with a keynote from Jim Collins.

    Since his previous books, Collins has been challenged on whether companies can really be built to last. This seems particularly unlikely given the decline and collapse in many previously leading financial and industrial companies over the last year.

    But there are examples of enduring greatness (P&G, Johnson & Johnson, GE etc).

    Collins still believes that, whatever its history, a company does need to decline. Products and services may become obsolete but that doesn’t mean that the companies that make / supply them need to become obsolete and irrelevant.  And its future – whether it prevails or fails, endures or dies - is largely in its own hands.  Companies decline not because of broader changes in the world or competition but because of what do to themselves.

    In Good to Great and Built to Last, Collins looked at great companies.  He still believes that the starting point for any truly great organisation is to get the right people and then do – who and then what.  And that good is the enemy of great.  And great comes from conscious choice and discipline.  According to Collins, this isn’t a perspective, but an empirical fact.

    In How the Mighty Fall, Collins looked at the process of decline.  There is a 5 stage process:

    1. Hubris born of success
    2. Undisciplined pursuit of more
    3. Denial of risk and peril
    4. Grasping for salvation
    5. capitulation to irrelevance and death.

     

    In the first 2 stages, companies look the same from outside, so how do you know if you’re in one of these stages?  Note you can get all the way to the end of this process and come back and be great – even if you stumble, the future’s still in your hands.  (Collins’ next book will look at what stops an organisation doing something great from spinning out of control.)

    The answer is not to think of yourself as great (the minute you do, you’re not).

     

    Getting to great / avoiding the fall

    The main action you can take to avoid decline is to take responsibility for your results, rather than taking personal credit for good times but blaming external events for the bad.  Both decline and ascent are self inflicted.

    You also need to ensure that you have a set of values and a purpose beyond just making money.  This is the hedgehog concept that I think goes beyond Collins’ BHAG concept.  It refers to a combination of being passionate about; being the best in the world and economic demination (see my posts on ‘mojo’).

    You need to execute well - most companies fall not because they fail to take advantage of new innovations but because they fail to execute.

    And don’t forget about Level 5 leadership.  The main attribute here is humility, built on ambition for the organisation rather than themselves, and the determination to do what is needed to succeed.  And note that great leaders can’t make a company great on their own – they need to get the best people into the key seats – and it’s this team that make the company great.  But poor leaders can ruin a company completely on their own!

    You need to keep great leaders onboard – it takes at least seven years to become great,

    Finally put people first.  Before any financials are discussed, talk about how many key seats you have on the bus – and how many of these are filled with the right people.  Have the numbers.

    Oh, and don’t worry too much about mergers and acquisitions, executive compensation, or motivating people (the right people are self motivating) – these have no correlation with great performance.

     

    More specifically:

    1. Conduct a self-diagnosis (see Collins’ website)
    2. Track seats and people in these seats
    3. Build a personal Board of Directors – choose people for their character (I like this idea)
    4. Turn off electronic gadgets – disciplined thought needs time to think (at least3 days of white space every 2 weeks)
    5. Double your questions to statements ratio (focus on being interested vs being interesting)
    6. Help your organisation build a Council to focus on the hedgehog circles above
    7. Do a not-do-to-list (stop doing vs start doing) – do we add this an action to our to-do-lists?
    8. Replace job titles with responsibilities
    9. Re-articulate and re-commit to your values you will not compromise
    10. Set your BHAGs 15-25 years into the future.

     

    Collins left us with the challenge to “be useful”!  I hope you found this blog / this post useful – please comment below if you do!

     

    Find further conference reports at

    http://strategic-hcm.blogspot.com/cipd09

    http://twitter.com/joningham

     

    Come back on Friday 20 November for a summary of the whole conference.

     

     

     

  • Consulting - Research - Speaking  - Training -  Writing
  • Strategy  -  Talent  -  Engagement  -  Change and OD
  • Contact  me to  create more  value for  your business
  • jon  [dot] ingham [at] strategic [dash] hcm [dot] com

    .

  •